In a recent New York courtroom incident, 74-year-old entrepreneur Jerome Dewald attempted to present his legal argument using an AI-generated avatar, leading to immediate backlash from the presiding judge.
Dewald, representing himself in an employment dispute, had received permission to submit a pre-recorded video for his oral argument. However, instead of appearing himself, he utilized an AI avatar named "James," created through the Tavus platform, to deliver his statements. The avatar, a younger-looking man in a professional setting, began the presentation with, "May it please the court, I come here today a humble pro se before a panel of five distinguished justices."
Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels promptly interrupted, questioning the identity of the speaker. Upon Dewald's admission that the figure was an AI-generated avatar and not a real person, the judge expressed her disapproval, stating, "It would have been nice to know that when you made your application. You did not tell me that, sir, I don't appreciate being misled."
Dewald explained that he opted for the avatar due to difficulties with extended speaking, a result of a past medical condition. He believed that the AI representation would more effectively convey his arguments. However, the court emphasized the importance of transparency and the need for prior disclosure of such methods.
This incident underscores the growing tension between emerging AI technologies and traditional legal practices. Legal experts caution that while AI tools can assist individuals lacking legal representation, courts are likely to resist their use without clear guidelines and full disclosure. The case highlights the necessity for the legal system to address the integration of AI in courtroom proceedings thoughtfully and transparently.
Dewald has since submitted an apology to the court, acknowledging the oversight and reaffirming his intent to present his case effectively, not to deceive. The court has not indicated any sanctions but has made it clear that such practices require prior approval and transparency.
As AI continues to evolve, its role in legal settings remains a topic of debate, emphasizing the need for clear regulations and ethical considerations in its application.